Mike Williams. Photo credit BucsNation |
Sleepers are generally those that are projected to be
drafted late (say, the 50th wide receiver or the 12th quarterback) who are
expected to outperform their projection significantly (to become around the 25th best
receiver or 8th best quarterback).
Predicting sleepers can be difficult but not altogether
unfruitful. FFToolbox’s
list of 2012 sleepers for wide receivers was surprisingly productive. Below
is a table of the sleepers, their projected receiver ranking by FFToolbox,
their collective Average Draft Position (ranked by draft performance against
other receivers) and their final rank in standard scoring leagues.
Receiver
|
Proj. WR Rank
|
ADP WR Rank
|
Final WR Rank
|
Diff from Proj
|
Randall Cobb
|
53
|
47
|
18
|
35
|
Malcom Floyd
|
34
|
38
|
36
|
-2
|
Leonard Hankerson
|
78
|
67
|
63
|
15
|
James Jones
|
57
|
61
|
16
|
41
|
Brandon LaFell
|
36
|
53
|
48
|
-12
|
Greg Little
|
55
|
42
|
52
|
3
|
Denarius Moore
|
30
|
34
|
33
|
-3
|
Santana Moss
|
54
|
56
|
41
|
13
|
Torrey Smith
|
31
|
28
|
23
|
8
|
Kendall Wright
|
44
|
48
|
55
|
-11
|
Titus Young
|
50
|
35
|
71
|
-21
|
That’s a fairly impressive hit rate, with huge hits on James
Jones and Randall Cobb (who share a productive quarterback, to be fair).
Leonard Hankerson and Santana Moss were decent hits and aside from Titus Young
(who had extenuating circumstances), there were few big misses. The average
difference with Titus Young was six ranks. Without him, it was nine ranks.
But, for the most part, drafting most of these players didn’t
produce starting value (except for Torrey Smith, who was projected as a flex starter
regardless). 3 out of 11 isn’t great, and not the type of hit value that
defines successful fantasy players.
So why not pick a sleeper with a history of production and young
enough to continue to grow?
Mike Williams of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers continues to be
ignored by fantasy mavens and the general public, despite putting up the 17th-most
points in standard leagues last year (that’s more than Randall Cobb).
On average, he was the 129th player drafted in non-IDP
leagues and was the 46th receiver to go—a soft WR4 or backup flex option in a
thin week.
He ended as a decent WR2 with somewhat consistent
production, producing between 3 and 15
points a game, twice going above fifteen.
In fact, for a starting fantasy receiver, he’s been
remarkably consistent. Standard deviation is a statistical measure that looks
at the average difference from the typical production—the higher the number,
the less consistent the receiver.
Every receiver that ranked above him, except for one, in
standard scoring leagues had a higher standard deviation and was therefore more
inconsistent from week to week. Wes Welker had a standard deviation of 5.31,
while Williams had a standard deviation of 5.33.
Generally, the receivers above him averaged a standard deviation
of 7.15. This is a pretty good test not just of fantasy usefulness and
repeatability, but also of the ability to repeat numbers from year to year.
Players with lower standard deviations are less likely to bust the next year
than ones with inconsistent production (like Brian Hartline or Michael Crabtree).
Receivers who produce extraordinary numbers, like Calvin
Johnson, might have higher standard deviations but not be all that
inconsistent. Dividing standard deviation by their average point value then
produces an adjusted consistency score, where higher numbers are
worse—indicating that a player is very fluky for how much they produce.
When corrected, Calvin Johnson is about as consistent as
they come, but warning flags pop up for Crabtree, Dez Bryant, Andre Johnson,
Roddy White (who produced a final stretch of games worth 2 points, 17.7 points,
1.6 points, 27.3 points and 4.2 points), Victor Cruz, and some others. Not so
for the criminally underrated Williams.
Despite the fact that his 2011 season was not stellar
(ranking 50th among receivers), the 3-year rule (he was drafted in 2010) and a
fantastic 2010 rookie season (ranking 11th among receivers) should give owners
faith that the sophomore season was the fluke and that his 2013 production is a
reliable indicator of what he will do. He has Vincent Jackson to continue to draw
coverage away from him and a coach willing to throw the ball more often than
league average (on over 56 percent of attempts). Williams could shine.
In MyFantasyLeague mock drafts, Mike Williams is the 104th
player to go, and the 41st receiver. In Fantasy Pros’ composite rankings, he’s
the 94th player to go and the 36th receiver. FFtoolbox ranks him 101st overall
and the 39th receiver, while FootballGuys ranks him 95th overall and agrees
that he is the 39th receiver.
In 10-person leagues, that means he’ll typically go at the
bottom of the 9th round or the beginning of the 10th. Grab him in the 8th round
in those leagues (or in the 7th round of 12-person leagues) and you’ll find you’ve
invested a WR4 draft pick to grab a receiver who can produce low WR2 numbers from
week to week better than most top-rated receivers can.
Remember, you’re playing to score the most points every
week, not score the most points at the end of the season.
No comments:
Post a Comment